Re:Names are not type safety
by CyberRabbi on Monday November 02, 2020 @02:19AM
(#24965467)
Hmm asking to read something more carefully is not rude if the commenter is refuting a point that was never made in the article.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Names are not type safety
by quietbritishjim on Monday November 02, 2020 @03:12AM
(#24965674)
It would suffice to say "that point was not made on the article".
Re:Names are not type safety
by loup-vaillant on Monday November 02, 2020 @04:59AM
(#24966326)
That's unnecessarily cautious. Unfounded criticism rightly deserves a slap on the hand, and "Read the article more carefully" is a very light one.