Re:I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvo...
by hackinthebochs on Thursday April 28, 2011 @08:56PM
(#2495890)
Most upvotes are going to be based on agreement, its simply psychological. We're more likely to even consider upvoting something if we agree with it. Downvotes on the other hand, have a detrimental effect such that we can stop to think if this actually deserves a downvote after we get the impulse. So even though ideally upvotes should be about adding to discussion, it's just not going to play out that way.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvo...
by dwc on Thursday April 28, 2011 @11:05PM
(#2496184)
I think it's even worse: upvotes are upvotes, and the reason why someone clicked it varies. It could mean "I agree," "this was well stated and insightful" or even "I disagree and it's dumb and mean but so represents common sentiment that I think everyone should read this."
The symbol is a little triangle, and inherently says none of those things. People will click to mean whatever they mean.
Re:I don't learn anything on HN anymore, bring back the upvo...
by goblin89 on Thursday May 05, 2011 @12:36PM
(#2517971)
Person feel obliged to register their opinion on some question. And upvoting appears the only acceptable way to do this (since "me too"-kind responses get downvoted quickly). So I think the ways to increase voting quality are: 1) allow to register user's agreement/disagreement with the post separately of the post itself (like another voting button), or 2) say in rules that you can't display your agreement or disagreement by upvoting. I think 2 is the best, since users will be forced to make sufficient contribution when they agree or disagree.