Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ...
by greesil on Friday October 30, 2020 @03:27PM
(#24945939)
Can you blame them after what happened in Florida in 2000?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ...
by projektfu on Friday October 30, 2020 @03:39PM
(#24946079)
It was very mean of the greens to vote for their preferred candidate.
Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ...
by hhjinks on Friday October 30, 2020 @10:40PM
(#24948731)
On the other hand, it can be argued that 400 green votes to Al Gore would've unmade the Bush presidency and all the misery that followed.
Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ...
by projektfu on Saturday October 31, 2020 @09:31AM
(#24951323)
On the other hand, one way or another the entire Democratic operation with all of its spending couldn’t secure those additional votes (closer to 600) in Florida and they didn’t bother challenging voter suppression efforts, basically rolling their eyes at those sounding the alarm. It’s also possible that the early call of Florida swung the election too close by encouraging last minute voters to stay home in the panhandle, and it really was a stronger Bush victory. Also, if they could have prevented so much vote spoiling through the confusing ballots and malfunctioning “machines” or marking devices, which was in the Democrats court as the vote supervisors in the counties they control; Gore would have won. But, sure, it’s a good look for the Democratic party to suppress democracy.