Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in a Presidential Election

Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ... by winstonewert on Friday October 30, 2020 @01:27PM (#24944648)

Do you have a specific example where this scenario played out?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ... by area_man_2 on Friday October 30, 2020 @01:44PM (#24944858)

This happened in the 2016 Washington State Treasurer election

https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Treasurer_election,_2016

Duane Davidson (R) won against Michael Waite (R) after 3 democrats split the vote in the primary:

    Republican Duane Davidson 25.09% 322,374
     Republican Michael Waite 23.33% 299,766
     Democratic Marko Liias 20.36% 261,633
     Democratic John Paul Comerford 17.97% 230,904
     Democratic Alec Fisken 13.24% 170,117

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ... by winstonewert on Sunday November 01, 2020 @10:45AM (#24960201)

I'm not sure any of the alternative systems would have actually given a different result. Yes, the democrats have a majority of the vote, but transfer of support between members of a party is never perfect.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ... by Frondo on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @12:42PM (#24981906)

I'm also not sure if this is enough of a problem to try to solve preemptively, if there's one example from four years ago from a state-level election.

If outcomes in general are better, I'll take the risk that they're occasionally worse.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Maine Becomes First State to Use Ranked-Choice Voting in ... by hef19898 on Friday October 30, 2020 @03:46PM (#24946166)

Well that raises the question why there were 3 Dems to begin with.

[ Parent | on HN ]