Re:Leveraging a 3D printer “defect” to create a new quasi-te...
by himinlomax on Friday October 30, 2020 @09:10AM
(#24941814)
It looks like it works not by constantly underextruding, but only intermittently. The parts where the strands join are overextruded if anything.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Leveraging a 3D printer “defect” to create a new quasi-te...
by lylecheatham on Friday October 30, 2020 @01:26PM
(#24944633)
I'm pretty sure it's actually just a continuous under extrusion. It becomes periodic in nature because material gathers under the nozzle and then it hits the blob from the previous layer and gets pulled off. It's a similar effect to how droplets form and fall off of your faucet when the flow rate is low. This also leads to the diagonal angles seen as the Z-height goes up.
It's usually hard to get this to happen consistently, which they've done quite well.
I've got no citations, but I worked in FDM Additive Manufacturing for a few years, and spent 4 months of that designing extruders for a name brand company.
Re:Leveraging a 3D printer “defect” to create a new quasi-te...
by londons_explore on Friday October 30, 2020 @06:29PM
(#24947480)
What surprises me is quite how consistent it is. The blobs look perfectly consistent over thousands of layers, which seems very unlikely - even a tiny perturbation would grow bigger in each successive layer and eventually cause the blobs to be chaotic in nature, even if the first row was consistent.
Re:Leveraging a 3D printer “defect” to create a new quasi-te...
by himinlomax on Sunday November 01, 2020 @03:52AM
(#24958134)
I wouldn't be so sure, I saw a video of variable infill extrusion and it looked somewhat like this, although over a greater distance but otoh much faster. Speaking of which, it seems to be printing quite slowly.