I would posit that for normal run-of-the-mill communications, anonymity is overrated. What is this edge case of politically sensitive communications that you think is at risk?

Most HNers here including yourself are writing comments with the comfort of anonymity. I don't want to worry about anything I have to say being tied to my identity, whether it's even my thoughts that there's nothing wrong with a "master" branch much less my much more unsavory thoughts in the tech space.

Isn't it possible that people become more comfortable attacking common sense opinions like that because they are only expressed in pseudonymity? If the veil were lifted, we'd all have to stand behind our opinions, and people who wanted to disagree would have to do it to our faces. Maybe removing humanity from the internet is not the panacea it seems?

I lose my job for supporting the wrong candidate?

What isn’t “politically sensitive”?

If you create a git repo, the first branch’s name is a controversial political issue.

“Everything’s political” ~ What’s-his-face the communist in Fiddler on the Roof after introducing “Will you marry me?” as “a political question.”