News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing? by learnstats2 on Thursday October 29, 2020 @08:22AM (#24929706)
>There's a tendency to label whoever you have beef with. Investors, bankers, the wealthy, political elites, the upper class...

Are these supposed to be different groups of people?

Re:Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing? by dalbasal on Thursday October 29, 2020 @08:38AM (#24929829)
They're pretty tightly clustered, but each have their own connotations, rhetorically.

Remember that the original liberals and republicans were (arguably) conducting conflicts within this overall cluster. In France it was the sans culotte vs the old nobility and clerics. You could argue that zuck or murdoch represents either side.

Re:Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing? by meekrohprocess on Thursday October 29, 2020 @11:56AM (#24931859)
I don't think the sans culotte were part of the wealthy classes...doesn't it translate to something like, "without fancy pants"?

I could see an argument that Zuck and Murdoch are like pied pipers leading the modern sans culotte around by the nose, though. I'm not looking forward to the upcoming Terrors, in that analogy.

Re:Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing? by joe_biden123 on Thursday October 29, 2020 @03:21PM (#24934492)
if you read turchin's paper his model has 3 parts. one accounts for elite competition, another for general/unskilled population wealth and a third one for the society's economy. elites aren't the only thing that produces instability those 2 other things