>3090 is actually a Titan without the Titan name.

AdoredTV made an entire video[0] to demonstrate this is absolutely baseless conjecture that NVIDIA Marketing tricked people into inferring.

It absolutely destroys the Titan idea, leaving no room for doubt.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s23GvbQfyLA

I've gotta watch 30 minutes from some tech tuber to get your point? C'mon dude.

I was curious so I watched. It's a good video. I ended up going with the 3090 because of the extra vram and I'm familiar with CUDA but I'm not under the impression that this thing is a "Titan" even if it is all arbitrary corporate market segmentation. Relevant bit is at 15 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s23GvbQfyLA&15m1s

People who hate video can process a 4 page article in 15 seconds rather than minutes

There is no reason AMD wouldn't pull their own "Titan"-class GPU. A 6900XT with 32GB of HBM would destroy anything NVidia could muster.

I mean they kinda already did put out a Titan class card. My point was that the 3090 is a Titan in all but name, and AMD unveiled their very capable response today.

I'm saying the only reason Nvidia didn't call it a Titan was because they knew it wasn't going to have an unassailable advantage over AMD.

There's no Titan-"class"

A Nvidia card is Titan if it has the name and the drivers, and not if it doesn't.

You're no fun.

AMD Titan-class cards tend to have HBM. I'm saying that AMD can very probably still do even better.

AMD has a CDNA in their pipeline which they haven't talked about in a while. That's their compute oriented architecture, whereas RDNA is graphics-oriented.

Indeed. I still think it might be possible to see an RDNA2 HBM card.