So I went through the hiring process. There's an online proprietary aptitude test that's required of all candidates, and it's apparently such a big deal, that you can only take it once per 6 months. They start you off with a practice test served from a non-CapitalOne FQDN, then the real one served from a CapitalOne FQDN. Well, I took both, and got an error at the end of the real one. Apparently, Firefox is explicitly supported on the practice test, but only IE11 is supported on the real one. The error meant none of my exam results were recorded, and due to some technicality, that meant I was SOL for 6 months.
My experience with CapitalOne, the "tech company" whose aptitude exam required a legacy browser, ended right there.
Is it at least a technical test?
"Aptitudes and psychometric tests" are, to me, a red flag at tech companies, that it's HR and not engineering that's in charge of hiring.
They say this to attract talent. The talent doesn't remain long unless they get into all the politics and butt sniffing that goes on at large established companies. Those that actually produce end up being taken advantage of and credit goes towards the people that manage them.
No matter how much the tech contributes to the bottom line, bonus and incentives are still focused on the trading floor and salespeople.
Is it branding or an actual shift?
I've seen many companies pivot to being "tech companies" but still didn't have incentives in place to attract real talent, and more crucially that still treated software and tech as a cost center.
But hey they had bean bags!