Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ...
by kortilla on Monday October 26, 2020 @01:11PM
(#24898477)
The problem is increasing the reward makes the people “who need the money” much more willing to engage in trials with much worse possible side effects. As long as the pay isn’t life altering money for anyone, nobody will volunteer to do something with a high probability of life altering side effects.
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ...
by TheKarateKid on Monday October 26, 2020 @01:07PM
(#24898429)
Exactly my thoughts. Hardly anyone from these groups is doing it “for science.” It’s for money.
Thinking otherwise is willful ignorance, and this is clearly exploitation of lower income groups.
It's kind of like non-pay electoral offices. You only get candidates that can afford not to work. In medical trials, you get the kind of people that are willing to, for example, get infected with the common cold and have you blood drawn 6x a day for 4 days for about 80 bucks a day. It was not horrible, but often uncomfortable. Study recruiters still call me, and now that I have a decent paying job there is no way I would ever consider doing those kinds of studies again. Simply not worth it.