News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by MereInterest on Monday October 26, 2020 @09:32AM (#24895958)
Public money pays for the roads. After the road is built, the road belongs to the public. Public money pays for the research. After the research finishes, the results should belong to the public, the same way as the road does.
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by FrojoS on Monday October 26, 2020 @09:47AM (#24896094)
The public can of course sell (i), charge (ii) or monetize in any other way.

(i) e.g. privatization of telephone networks

(ii) e.g. toll roads and bridges

Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by reegnz on Monday October 26, 2020 @10:27AM (#24896486)
They belong to a publicly funded research institute that was given the right by the public to sell it's research to private enterprise.

The 'public' wanted that by voting in the lawmakers making that possible.

That's how democracy works.

Also we're not talking about physical things, but something 'intellectual' like software, so the comparison is inaccurate.

More accurate would be IT research done in a publicly funded university.

Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by hobofan on Monday October 26, 2020 @09:50AM (#24896120)
> After the road is built, the road belongs to the public.

Depending on where you live, you could very well be under the impression that the roads belong to delivery companies, taxis, etc. (private companies that make money off them) as they are effectively useless to everyone else (= the public) while they are constantly blocking them.