Re:Suppression is a bigger scandal than the actual story
by nradov on Monday October 26, 2020 @01:14AM
(#24893023)
Election meddling in general isn't a crime. It's not something the government could charge the site owner for, unless they somehow violated campaign finance laws.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Suppression is a bigger scandal than the actual story
by skinkestek on Monday October 26, 2020 @03:39AM
(#24893674)
> It's not something the government could charge the site owner for,
I didn't mean the site owner did election meddling, rather than Facebook when thet selectively block sites like this.
Re:Suppression is a bigger scandal than the actual story
by nradov on Monday October 26, 2020 @09:04AM
(#24895702)
That is still not a crime.
Re:Suppression is a bigger scandal than the actual story
by skinkestek on Monday October 26, 2020 @09:33AM
(#24895965)
Ok then. You might very well be right.
But what is the rule then? Manipulating social media in front of an election is only illegal if you are a foreigner?
Re:Suppression is a bigger scandal than the actual story
by jjeaff on Monday October 26, 2020 @12:40PM
(#24898097)
Sometimes, election meddling can be seen as an in-kind campaign contribution and thus illegal if it is not within campaign finance rules.
For example, cohen paying off Trump's mistresses was prosecuted as an illegal campaign contribution.