Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by zepearl on Sunday October 25, 2020 @05:15PM
(#24889937)
I agree. On one hand I can understand the need to shrink code, focus on the core functionality etc..., but on the other hand X has e.g. "xset" and "xbindkeys" which can be used for all X-desktops (or "Window Managers" or however they're called). With wayland each single desktop environment has to re-implement all that functionality => looks like wasted effort to me - the modularity (from the point of view of functionality) of X is lost in Wayland.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by the_why_of_y on Monday October 26, 2020 @03:32PM
(#24900269)
One of the innovations since the 1980s when X was designed are shared libraries, so you can have libweston and wlroots now https://github.com/swaywm/wlroots
X11 used shared libraries since its beginning in the 1980s.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by the_why_of_y on Monday October 26, 2020 @05:26PM
(#24901648)
SunOS paper about shared libraries, 1987
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.37.9...
SunOS 4.0 lists "dynamic linking" as new feature, released 1988
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SunOS
AT&T System V Release 3 got shared libraries in 1986
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_V_Release_4#SVR3
While the first X11 release was in 1987, the fundamental architecture was designed already since 1984, and this architecture includes a heavyweight server that implements things that in most other window systems are done client-side.