News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung group chairman Lee Kun-hee has died by godelski on Saturday October 24, 2020 @11:17PM (#24883605)
My understanding is that this only happened in this case because Samsung is "too big to fail" for the Korean economy. Kia, LG, and Samsung combined make up 2/3rds of the economy.

Worth watching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRzysFhyZ8Y (@11:45 they talk about TBTF)

Re:Samsung group chairman Lee Kun-hee has died by LudwigNagasena on Sunday October 25, 2020 @12:01AM (#24883739)
They are too big to fail and that’s why the government wants a single family to control it?
Re:Samsung group chairman Lee Kun-hee has died by godelski on Sunday October 25, 2020 @03:07AM (#24884383)
It has been working well so far. There's the old saying "don't fix it if it ain't broken." I think there's plenty of arguments to make that it is broken, but there are plenty to say it isn't. There are different views on this held by different people and different countries. Some would say break it up so it isn't too big to fail. Others say it is the size that allows it to do so well. Unfortunately the nature of the conversation is extremely complex and often these discussions turn reductionist.
Re:Samsung group chairman Lee Kun-hee has died by plorkyeran on Sunday October 25, 2020 @01:30AM (#24884090)
TBTF is the public justification they give, but the actual reason is probably that the chaebol and government have always been very intertwined, and not always in the direction of the government exerting influence on the chaebol.
Re:Samsung group chairman Lee Kun-hee has died by jbay808 on Sunday October 25, 2020 @01:33AM (#24884098)
I don't know why you're being downvoted, it's a fair question.

I assume that the government doesn't necessarily care to have a single family control it. But they'd perhaps rather not push a legal campaign against that controlling family, and risk causing harm to (or retribution from) Samsung in the process.