Re:The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon
by Camas on Friday October 23, 2020 @11:17AM
(#24870355)
Article doesn't mention any bomb and "shot up" is stretching things.
Re:The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon
by bleepblorp on Friday October 23, 2020 @11:29AM
(#24870495)
Updated. The QAnon bomber was, indeed, a different incident in Illinois. The Hoover Dam incident only involved firearms and an armored vehicle.
And what term other than 'shot up' would you use to describe a deranged person recklessly discharging a firearm as part of a targeted attack?
Re:The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon
by Camas on Friday October 23, 2020 @11:57AM
(#24870848)
He shot a locked door three times trying to open it. You know "shot up" is misleading, that's why you've already downgraded it to reckless discharge.
Re:The Now-Defunct Firms Behind 8chan, QAnon
by bleepblorp on Friday October 23, 2020 @01:16PM
(#24871702)
The question of what constitutes 'shot up' is too pedantic to be worth considering further.
Why are you so invested in defending an extremist conspiracy theory from criticism?
QAnon is, politically, an auxiliary of the Republican party. This, combined with the willingness of QAnon followers to use violence, means that the movement has the potential to be a proto-brownshirt movement. This is not something to dismiss lightly.
QAnon is not a self-contained trash bin, it's a cancer that has metastasized into both violence and into the mainstream of American politics.
Hello, QAnon downvoters.
[0] https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2020/02/1...
[1] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-man-with-assault-rifle-d...
[2] https://www.ctc.usma.edu/the-qanon-conspiracy-theory-a-secur...
[3] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/15/qanon-violen...