Re:Activists turn facial recognition tools against the police
by xapata on Friday October 23, 2020 @02:49PM
(#24872554)
Well, that's not really a "right to privacy" except in how it's been interpreted in court. So, Common Law says it we have the right, because of the precedent of past interpretations. The precedent also holds that the meaning of the right to privacy will drift over time as technology changes.
Re:Activists turn facial recognition tools against the police
by Jon_Lowtek on Friday October 23, 2020 @11:13PM
(#24876646)
It is not an "unreasonable search" if you install the cloud-enabled camera that is embedded in some other device yourself and click ok on a ten page legal contract you didn't read.
Americans do.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."