News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by jonathan-neil on Friday October 23, 2020 @01:59AM (#24866441)
With all due respect, my experience has been the complete opposite of yours. Do you by chance have any evidence for these claims or are they simply your best guess asserted as fact?
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by xtracto on Friday October 23, 2020 @09:59AM (#24869548)
Ok tell us about your experience and add to the conversation. These passive aggressive comments do not provide anything and I'm sure they are against this community rules.
[dead]
[dead]
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by okareaman on Friday October 23, 2020 @02:45AM (#24866644)
You said "my experience." I'd be glad to talk to you if you are a driver. I've done over 2000 rides (not a lot compared to other drivers I know) all over California. My anecdotal evidence isn't nonsense.
[dead]
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by okareaman on Friday October 23, 2020 @03:19AM (#24866823)
I did 2000 rides in a year. That works out to be about 8 rides a day. That doesn't seem so far fetched. You've already made up your mind so I don't know why you bother making comments to me.
[dead]
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by alickz on Friday October 23, 2020 @05:12AM (#24867420)
Accusing people of being shills is against the HackerNews guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

>Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken.

Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by okareaman on Friday October 23, 2020 @05:12AM (#24867423)
I'm a retired programmer working in Silicon Valley. I'm like a kid in a candy store in some regards, such as I picked up one of the top VR developers in the world at the San Jose Convention Center and gave him a long ride. He was excited to talk about VR and convinced me to buy what he was working on. I did! I wouldn't be a shill if Uber/Lyft paid me. There's no fun in that. As I mentioned elsewhere, I really like messing around with their algorithms to see how they work. You can't subvert real enthusiasm, but nice try!
[dead]
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by viridian on Friday October 23, 2020 @01:26PM (#24871794)
Don't be a passive aggressive asshole.
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by Cederfjard on Friday October 23, 2020 @03:16AM (#24866807)
Why is that an unbelievable number? Uber has been around for a decade now, surely there’s been ample time?
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by jonathan-neil on Friday October 23, 2020 @03:54AM (#24867017)
The number of rides isn't unbelievable. What is unbelievable is that 2000 rides by 1 person would render a data set that would scientifically support even a fraction of the claims in his original post.
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by Cederfjard on Friday October 23, 2020 @06:21AM (#24867879)
OK, but we were always talking about anecdotal data in casual conversation right, not hardcore scientific analysis? I think even the original poster acknowledged that.
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by jonathan-neil on Friday October 23, 2020 @08:13AM (#24868601)
No he did not acknowledge that, please quote him if I missed it somehow. He presented a long list, as fact, and when questioned for a source he dodged the question, then when asked again he claimed he drove a lot one year. But the claims he's making are about other drivers and factors he simply could not determine as a single driver in a limited region. The original post, as it was written is absolute useless ignorance at best and active disinformation at worst.
Re:California appeals court rules Uber, Lyft must reclassify... by ralfd on Friday October 23, 2020 @11:08AM (#24870265)
You said to him:

> I'll ask it again and if you answer, I'll gladly answer yours as well.

You should hold up your end of the bargain.