Is that after adjusting for things like population density/urbanization?
Also, while I don't have an easy cross references of case rates and restrictions, it certainly looks like the places at the top of per-capita case rates are also disproportionately places that have not had strong mandatory restrictions, so I suspect your claim is wrong as stated, too.
These states have had some of the harshest restrictions. They've gotten worse results than the mixed approach for the rest of the country.
Good case in point: Michigan vs Florida. Both have about the same deaths per million at 74 and 75 respectively. Yet Florida is fully open with no restrictions. And Michigan had some of the harshest lockdowns and restrictions.
Density may have been some kind of argument early on, but we are 9 or 10 months into this. The virus has had a chance to spread.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109011/coronavirus-covi...
That is cumulative not current status; unsurprisingly, the states that were hit the hardest often instituted the strongest controls.
But in current cases, those aren't the top any more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/national/corona...