News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The TRIPS project: an explicit data graph execution (EDGE... by aakshintala on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @05:21PM (#24852326)
Keep in mind this was an academic project. The project ran its course, produced many dissertations, and more importantly successful researchers and engineers, and inspired many others to look at FPGAs and dataflow. It wasn't ever meant to be about a product or building a company...

I would counter that the project was immensely successful with the stated academic goals: as proof, the Microsoft Azure AI HW division (formerly people responsible for project catapult) was almost entirely bootstrapped by many of the same people who worked on the TRIPS project.

Here's Doug Burger providing a small retrospective on the project: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/podcast/clouds-cata...

Re:The TRIPS project: an explicit data graph execution (EDGE... by gnufx on Thursday October 22, 2020 @02:43PM (#24861729)
I didn't necessarily mean building a product, or to put it down; I just wasn't aware of influences, and I'm close to a home of dataflow. Thanks for the background.
Re:The TRIPS project: an explicit data graph execution (EDGE... by aakshintala on Friday October 23, 2020 @01:20PM (#24871735)
My apologies if I came off unnecessarily reactive.
Re:The TRIPS project: an explicit data graph execution (EDGE... by borramakot on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @08:56PM (#24853929)
You say formerly catapult- is catapult no longer being developed?
Re:The TRIPS project: an explicit data graph execution (EDGE... by aakshintala on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @10:22PM (#24854319)
I don't work for Microsoft or have any real knowledge here, but my understanding (from the grapevine) is that the team essentially was given a much larger purview. So in a sense Catapult is evolving?