News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go. Parent comment

Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by Philippe_H on Monday October 19, 2020 @05:23PM (#24831183)
this is accounted for. By default you have a whitelist containing local lan IP ;)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by remram on Monday October 19, 2020 @07:53PM (#24832416)
Yeah I have 10+ machines with fail2ban configured and 0 of them on my LAN though.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by Philippe_H on Tuesday October 20, 2020 @06:01AM (#24835616)
well just whitelist your Public IPs or use a combo of IPset & port knockd. Works fine for me for variable IPs.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by fulafel on Monday October 19, 2020 @10:56PM (#24833531)
LAN addresses, eh? People do still use internet addressing on our networks despite the consumer CPE vendors increasingly trying to sell you NAT stockholm syndrome :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by pantalaimon on Tuesday October 20, 2020 @05:40AM (#24835461)
the machines i'm ruining fail2ban on are on public networks, not my LAN.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by rhizome on Tuesday October 20, 2020 @01:06PM (#24839821)
You don't use static IPs for managing systems?
[ Parent | on HN ]