News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bolivia's socialists claim victory as unofficial count sh... by macspoofing on Monday October 19, 2020 @12:44PM (#24828084)
>Only Marxists oppose coups?

No. But I looked up the twitter account and a hammer/sickle is a tell-tale sign of Marxists.

>you just can't conclusively show Musk's involvement.

Let's be clear, you can't show ANY involvement by Musk. So all you're left with is FUD.

Re:Bolivia's socialists claim victory as unofficial count sh... by boomboomsubban on Monday October 19, 2020 @01:21PM (#24828559)
>Let's be clear, you can't show ANY involvement by Musk. So all you're left with is FUD.

Except the bit where he admitted it. I don't have any further evidence that he played a role in an incredibly beneficial event for him, that is true.

Re:Bolivia's socialists claim victory as unofficial count sh... by macspoofing on Monday October 19, 2020 @03:35PM (#24830021)
>Except the bit where he admitted it.

Let's just agree on this: responding with a troll response to a Marxist troll who accuses you of being complicit with a Bolivian coup, is not 'admitting' anything. It boggles my mind how you can possibly think otherwise.

Re:Bolivia's socialists claim victory as unofficial count sh... by boomboomsubban on Monday October 19, 2020 @08:47PM (#24832847)
I think otherwise as a mocking admission is still an admission. I'll agree that his words likely weren't meant to be taken literally, and that it's hardly proves his connection. Still, that response and his further attempts to draw it back don't make him look good.