Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go
by jdashg on Monday October 19, 2020 @12:04PM
(#24827652)
The title doesn't say that it's open source, though. (nor its license) It's specifically advertising itself based on its language, not its qualities.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go
by omginternets on Monday October 19, 2020 @12:07PM
(#24827684)
GitHub wasn't a dead giveaway? How about the MIT License badge on the page?
Come on, now...
I think it's safe to say that one should check these (obvious) things before posting a snarky comment. It seems to me that this is part of the HN community ethos.
Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go
by bityard on Monday October 19, 2020 @01:42PM
(#24828774)
> GitHub wasn't a dead giveaway?
There have been numerous source-available but proprietary github projects posted to HN.
Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go
by omginternets on Monday October 19, 2020 @01:49PM
(#24828843)
Good thing you can check the license!