Re:Bolivia's socialists claim victory as unofficial count sh...
by the_only_law on Monday October 19, 2020 @08:12AM
(#24825600)
Its pretty clear what I'm talking about given the direct quote and subsequent explanation.
> Allegedly? Who alleged this?
Literally the tweet you are attacking. I'm not sure if you are playing dumb on purpose or what.
Re:Bolivia's socialists claim victory as unofficial count sh...
by macspoofing on Monday October 19, 2020 @08:13AM
(#24825611)
Oh.. so the only person who 'alleged' this, was this bad faith doofus who accused Musk of supporting (or staging) the coup in Bolivia. Gotcha ... though I still fail to see what is the a good faith interpretation of that tweet.
Re:Bolivia's socialists claim victory as unofficial count sh...
by the_only_law on Monday October 19, 2020 @08:17AM
(#24825633)
The good faith (perhaps better faith is more appropriate) way to interpret it would be as I mentioned, and calling it out for its actual issues instead of trying to soapbox by building a strawman.
Re:Bolivia's socialists claim victory as unofficial count sh...
by macspoofing on Monday October 19, 2020 @08:24AM
(#24825681)
I'm not sure what it is you expected. If you start with accusing someone of staging or supporting a coup you lost the right to a good faith interpretation of your motives from that individual. But this is par for course from online marxists.
What are you talking about? The tweet Musk trolled is in bad faith. That doofus accused Musk of staging a coup. And yes, it is 'whataboutism'.
>another expenditure that (allegedly) Musk supported
Allegedly? Who alleged this? Where are you getting that from?