News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by hirundo on Saturday October 17, 2020 @10:38AM (#24810263)
Humans have tonal components to meaning, e.g. in English, "You are hungry." doesn't have the lift at the end as does "You are hungry?". I wonder if any birds do something similar to distinguish, e.g. "Predator!" vs "Predator?". Maybe someday an app on our phones will be able to translate as we walk through the woods, like "A female Carolina chickadee in the sycamore at 10 o'clock says there's a raven coming from the south".
Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by neffy on Saturday October 17, 2020 @10:54AM (#24810403)
There are features in the frequency ranges of bird calls that suggest this. Alarm calls are usually on frequencies that have better propagation (this also depends on the habitat that birds occupy - ground living birds have much lower frequency calls because the sound spreads better close to the ground. Calls that go to chicks tend to be on higher, less propagating frequencies. On the other side, the calls that hunting birds make tend to look like an all frequency sweep - possibly they are trying to get a response from other species to locate them.
Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by ineedasername on Saturday October 17, 2020 @06:44PM (#24814040)
This is the case even though English isn't even considered a tonal language. Mandarin is a highly tonal language with four distinct formalized tones. Not only that, but the brain has to adapt to pick out those tones clearly. As a result, "perfect pitch" is much more common for Mandarin speakers than speakers of non-tonal languages.
Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by gibolt on Saturday October 17, 2020 @07:01PM (#24814123)
Tonal here is very different. The tone in Chinese is a completely different word. Multiple words have the same tone and thus pronunciation with different meaning (and character). Tone usage on one word would not change the interpretation.

There are cases where this is kind of like English, in the case of buy/sell 买/卖, but still quite different

Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by ineedasername on Sunday October 18, 2020 @10:04AM (#24817962)
Yes, that's why I referred to Mandarin as a "tonal language". It is a formal linguistic categorization. Speakers of all languages may use tone, but an actual tonal language is quite different, taking the concept of tone to a another level in terms of grammatic and lexical importance.
Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by 737maxtw on Saturday October 17, 2020 @12:06PM (#24810974)
> "Predator!" vs "Predator?"

Should have gone with "Friendship!" VS "Friendship?"

Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by rthomas6 on Saturday October 17, 2020 @12:28PM (#24811122)
There really are birds that have predator warning calls. Other animals even listen for them and hide when they hear them.
Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by trgn on Saturday October 17, 2020 @12:59PM (#24811340)
We can always tell when our neighbor's cat is outside when the birds in our yards start to get agitated.
Re:Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird ca... by dontcarethrow2 on Saturday October 17, 2020 @03:55PM (#24812702)
I've noticed the warning call differs at times, I hear two chirps for land based predator and three for air. Small sample size, city finches.