Re:Covid: Remdesivir 'has little or no effect' on survival, ...
by jeegsy on Friday October 16, 2020 @12:23PM
(#24802321)
LOL..I knew the folks here would hate that. Seriously though, the idea that the Atlantic and balanced takes, particularly within the last few years can be used in the same sentence un-ironically is indeed a joke.
Re:Covid: Remdesivir 'has little or no effect' on survival, ...
by arcticbull on Friday October 16, 2020 @10:16PM
(#24806955)
I don't have anything against your reaction. I don't read the Atlantic; I saw this particular article, read it, lined up the facts with other things I'd read, and felt this piece reflected a more balanced take than mine. Not necessarily in absolute terms. That is what I meant by my note about balance.
I suppose next time I reply to a contentious topic I could find a more seemingly dispassionate source but these days most folks are too polarized to read any news source that doesn't align with their preconceived notions.
Re:Covid: Remdesivir 'has little or no effect' on survival, ...
by arcticbull on Friday October 16, 2020 @12:03PM
(#24802134)
For the intellectually curious, in what way?
Re:Covid: Remdesivir 'has little or no effect' on survival, ...
by freebasenic on Friday October 16, 2020 @12:17PM
(#24802256)
The Atlantic is a neo-lib magazine that leftists and right-wingers can agree is not even worth using as toilet paper.
This made me laugh out loud