News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Tested Comma AI's OpenPilot by raziel2p on Friday October 16, 2020 @06:03AM (#24799284)
> Perhaps the owner has temporarily put out an error to mask it during your inspection?

To be clear, I don't have a car or a driver's licence, I was just surprised that this standardization was a thing at all. Seems like a stark contrast to all the walled gardens in every other technology-related industry these days.

Re:We Tested Comma AI's OpenPilot by voqv on Friday October 16, 2020 @06:09AM (#24799316)
Actually not really all cars have one standard. Most German cars use Flexray which Openpilot does not currently support and is a bit more tricky to hack into as described by Comma.ai: https://medium.com/@comma_ai/hacking-an-audi-performing-a-ma...
Re:We Tested Comma AI's OpenPilot by bipson on Friday October 16, 2020 @06:40AM (#24799448)
Only very recent cars use Flexray, and also not true for all manufacturers. CAN is still widely used, and some want to skip Flexray entirely for the next thing...
Re:We Tested Comma AI's OpenPilot by jinzo on Friday October 16, 2020 @06:26AM (#24799390)
Only the really basic data (mostly related to emissions) and connector is standarised. Even the pinout of the connector (apart from the power supply and ground) differs quite a bit between manufacturers. The level of integration needed for actually driving the car is far from a standard. Not even that, most of the new cars have specific gateways which firewall the car electronics from the OBD port.

TL;DR: Apart from really basic data and physical connector, everything else is (ever more increasing) walled garden. With new VWs and Fiats requiring online connection for even most basic operations - so even if you know the protocol, you have to unlock it online (See VW SFD and Fiat SGW)