Re:FCC to move ahead with 'rulemaking' on Section 230
by srtjstjsj on Thursday October 15, 2020 @05:46PM
(#24794466)
And how are platforms to be regulated? Do they allow anonymous posters? Who investigates and removes harmful content?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC to move ahead with 'rulemaking' on Section 230
by hyper0perator on Thursday October 15, 2020 @06:52PM
(#24795241)
The phone company does unfortunately allow spam callers
Re:FCC to move ahead with 'rulemaking' on Section 230
by sixothree on Thursday October 15, 2020 @09:24PM
(#24796419)
I'm honestly quite sick of this argument. The issue with the phone company isn't the spam. It's the anonymity. All solutions to the spam issue don't deal with unwanted calls at all.
Re:FCC to move ahead with 'rulemaking' on Section 230
by eli on Thursday October 15, 2020 @07:53PM
(#24795804)
Is gmail allowed to filter out spam? Or does doing so make them an email publisher no longer exempt from liability for email contents?
Re:FCC to move ahead with 'rulemaking' on Section 230
by trident1000 on Thursday October 15, 2020 @05:54PM
(#24794563)
Really this is patchwork on what needs to be a major regulatory overhaul.
Things that need to be addressed: no advertising to kids, mob control, fake accounts/social manipulation, free speech, transparent and auditable algorithms (screw their IP). Its not an easy task to achieve all of these and other goals but it needs to get done before society literally goes into a civil war.