News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google disabled my husband's account by vessenes on Thursday October 15, 2020 @02:32PM (#24792046)
One thing that is tough about these stories is that there a class of US enforcement responses for which it is illegal to disclose why you responded.

For instance, it is a prison-time offence for an individual employee of a financial institution to tell a customer they filed a SAR on them.

The way you get kafka is BSA compliance officers have personal liability for this reporting, so they prefer not to have customers that trigger reporting, but they cant tell a customer why they are dumping them, so the word comes from ‘on high’ or an algorithm and thats it. Nobody internally can help because for their own good they do not know the reasons for account termination.

This may be that or it may not, but probably its not that google is being dicks to its own employees. It is an outcome of a pernicious set of government and institutional dynamics.

Re:Google disabled my husband's account by tehwebguy on Thursday October 15, 2020 @02:36PM (#24792116)
Filing a required financial report is not similar to terminating someone's access to their account
Re:Google disabled my husband's account by m00x on Thursday October 15, 2020 @02:42PM (#24792213)
Filing an SAR usually comes (99.99%) along with suspending the account. Suspension of account usually comes before filing the SAR as to stop any further illegal actions.
Re:Google disabled my husband's account by bigbubba on Thursday October 15, 2020 @03:04PM (#24792479)
> Filing an SAR usually comes (99.99%) along with suspending the account.

You're missing half of the analysis. What percentage of account suspensions are preceded by an SAR filing?

(Probably not many.)

Re:Google disabled my husband's account by reaperducer on Thursday October 15, 2020 @02:55PM (#24792367)
Google is not a government. It just acts like one.