News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dropship — successor to torrents? by limmeau on Sunday April 24, 2011 @11:33AM (#2479002)
Just read the reappeared sourcecode (assuming it works as advertised): The hash is an SHA256 of pure 4MB blocks in the input file. They add no message type information which could prevent mixups between Dropbox-deduplication hashes and hashes computed for other purposes.

The following dropship file was assembled using only shasum, ls and vi:

         {"blocks": ["f3f754a5dcd93f271ad013a5ee84f495a36da84f152e0a1fec4646345b0c10d6"], "name": "ostseestrand.jpg", "size": 514779}
Could someone who has never shared files with me verify that it indeed produces a picture of a beach?
Re:Dropship — successor to torrents? by pmocek on Tuesday April 26, 2011 @12:16AM (#2483966)
When I run dropship with a file containing the JSON you quoted, it prints, "('Oops, blocks are not known: %s', [u'8_dUpdzZPyca0BOl7oT0laNtqE8VLgof7EZGNFsMENY'])".
Re:Dropship — successor to torrents? by wladimir on Sunday April 24, 2011 @12:50PM (#2479148)
Yes, I've got the beach image in my Dropbox folder now :)
Re:Dropship — successor to torrents? by herbatnic on Monday April 25, 2011 @12:31PM (#2481834)
Yeah, Canon PowerShot A60 ;)