I don't really see why YouTube choosing not to display stuff its algorithms (rightly or wrongly) identify as bullshit about vaccines containing microchips is more objectionable than YouTube choosing not to display stuff its algorithms (rightly or wrongly) identify as sexual content though, as it has done since the very beginning.

Yes, algorithmic flagging gets things wrong, but there's nothing new in this announcement unless one believes that antivax sentiment, unlike nudity, is something YouTube ought to be obliged to broadcast