This plays out every day in the court system. Having a sufficiently clever lawyer does help. Having the truth on your side does too. Neither, not even both together, is a 100% guarantee.
It's not exactly a new problem: https://people.uwplatt.edu/~ciesield/platovsoph.htm
Is the point of this article that we shouldn't trust anything (even when there are numbers to back up the conclusion) or that we can find the truth if we are smart enough to ask the right questions?