Re:Spotify, Ever the Fans of Openness
by throwawaysea on Tuesday October 13, 2020 @12:28AM
(#24762275)
Winamp had much better skins than Spotify, and great visualizations (which seem to have disappeared as a feature in the modern audio world). But Spotify does make it convenient to have a portable library that doesn't need backing up. I hate the lock in (unable to export playlists), I hate the inflexibility of their apps, and I hate that they can exercise both financial and editorial control over music and podcasts. Things are going in a direction where I'll ultimately miss Winamp and the 'old days of Internet freedom'. But the problem is that right now, Spotify is convenient-enough that we will continue the march away from the free Internet. We will keep marching until we hate Spotify, but there's little to stop us along the way until it is too late.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Spotify, Ever the Fans of Openness
by tsimionescu on Tuesday October 13, 2020 @02:06AM
(#24762725)
It's probably much better if you think of Spotify as an evolution of music radio, not as an evolution of a music library.
Compared to traditional music radio, it is more expensive, but vastly more tailored to your own personal tastes (try finding an actual radio station playing prog rock one album at a time...).
> Winamp had much better skins than Spotify, and great visualizations
I admit I loved both of those things in 1999, but the novelty wore off. Outside of phone cases and laptop stickers, it looks like most people are over skins.