Promoting these views as truths should be treated as the hate speech it is. Which should not be covered by free speech, IMHO.
Upthread the guy said "Tolerance means putting up with things with which you disagree". He's arguing for no restrictions AFAICT. Hence my post, to which no answer was forthcoming from him.
I think that "disagree" isn't exactly the correct description of someone's stance vis-a-vis hate speech, particularly that which is targeted at them.
It has been noted that "The Bill of Rights is not a suicide pact". For what it's worth, tolerance isn't a suicide pact either: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
Personally, I draw the line where other people's freedoms are limited and other people are actively discriminated against. Basically at hate speech.
Also, I asked a very clear question and requested a clear yes/no. What is your answer?