News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Feds may target Google's Chrome browser for breakup by bdcravens on Sunday October 11, 2020 @06:33PM (#24749695)
The Baby Bell breakup was 36 years ago, resulting from antitrust action brought 46 years ago. Moreover, AT&T and Verizon have consolidated six of the seven Baby Bells into the 2 companies.
Re:Feds may target Google's Chrome browser for breakup by C1sc0cat on Monday October 12, 2020 @06:39AM (#24753086)
But it left the local monopoly in palace instead of mandating Local Loop Unbundling which is why the US and Canada has such poor competition for highspeed internet.
Re:Feds may target Google's Chrome browser for breakup by CydeWeys on Sunday October 11, 2020 @07:49PM (#24750123)
2 is still more than 1, and there was a lot more competition in the intervening decades when there were more than 2. So it sounds like it worked for the most part? Certainly more so than doing nothing.
Re:Feds may target Google's Chrome browser for breakup by srtjstjsj on Sunday October 11, 2020 @11:09PM (#24751073)
No, the "breakup" was a nonsensical geographical partition. I live in NY. Why would I event consider buying a phone line in CA?
Re:Feds may target Google's Chrome browser for breakup by salawat on Sunday October 11, 2020 @09:05PM (#24750518)
The issue is that the baby Bells were allowed to reconsolidate at all, or allowed to avoid competing in other provider's coverage areas. I agree some good came of the breakup, but the hands off position taken by subsequent administrations has allowed most of the Good to get undone.