News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A 20-year-old CRT monitor can be better than a 4K LCD (2019) by saurik on Sunday October 11, 2020 @04:39PM (#24748896)
I don't know what brand of LCD you might have, but do you have an opinion on the refresh rate settings? My Samsung 4k LCD has a feature I only a few days ago realized I had jacked up to "Fastest" as soon as I got it (from its default of "Standard"). It apparently does something wonky with the backlight? (And without it I think the published refresh rate is nowhere near accurate, as that's like the maximum if you are willing to accept the ramifications of this strobing?)
Re:A 20-year-old CRT monitor can be better than a 4K LCD (2019) by badsectoracula on Sunday October 11, 2020 @05:52PM (#24749405)
It is an Agon though i do not remember the exact model name[0]. What you refer to is some trick a few high end monitors have to alleviate image persistence. I think some also do black frame insertion (ie. they insert a black image inbetween updates) which also tries to reduce pixel persistence.

Both of them try to mimic how CRTs work (though i think black frame insertion is closer) but as a side effect they affect the image brightness (usually causing everything to become dimmer) and can introduce perceptible flickering. And yes, some monitors are indeed marketed as the theoretical refresh rate you'd achieve with these effects in action - you'd need to find dedicated monitor review sites (e.g. i've heard some good comments about rtings.com, though ignore the scores and look for the metrics... their scores take into consideration stuff you often wont care about) and of course look for comments on places like Reddit's /r/monitors subreddit for people who already bought a monitor.

[0] https://twitter.com/System32Comics/status/131319474720949862...