Re:A 20-year-old CRT monitor can be better than a 4K LCD (2019)
by dreamofkoholint on Sunday October 11, 2020 @01:47PM
(#24747613)
Yes! I think the ability to watch lower-res video (even 480p) on them and still have a decent picture is what I miss the most.
It would be quite comical if the 300lb figure were correct, having lugged one around before. They hovered around 92lbs, though.
Re:A 20-year-old CRT monitor can be better than a 4K LCD (2019)
by yardie on Monday October 12, 2020 @01:52PM
(#24757221)
> It would be quite comical if the 300lb figure were correct, having lugged one around before. They hovered around 92lbs, though.
I might be mistaken then. There was also a Trinitron in the room, 30-something inches and required 3 people to pick up. The FW900 certainly felt like 300lbs, for a single person.
LCDs at the time still left much to be desired so VFX houses weren't rushing to replace them with inferior, at the time, technology.
I remember running mine at a higher refresh rate. 75Hz and 100Hz was easily reachable. 120Hz and you started to drop resolution and the coils would sing. I miss the wide range of resolutions you could run. LCDs still haven't been able to replicate that without making everything a blurry, boxy mess.
I was able to take the broken smaller GDM-F500 (21") home. It was dim and after a bit of research I found out replacing a capacitor and a few resistors would bring it back. But it was terrifying working directly on the HV board. Once it was working I had so much screen. Almost getting electrocuted was practically it.