News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Modernising RISC OS in 2020: is there hope for the ancient ARM OS?. Parent comment

Re:Modernising RISC OS in 2020: is there hope for the ancien... by 082349872349872 on Saturday October 10, 2020 @01:53AM (#24736934)
If the things we do with with our home computers are crunching in kernel space instead of in userland, someone's done something wrong.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modernising RISC OS in 2020: is there hope for the ancien... by wk_end on Saturday October 10, 2020 @02:44AM (#24737091)
The article's talking about running 32-bit applications in emulation, with a 64-bit native kernel.

> Then a rewrite of RISC OS for 64-bit ARM chips would require a 32-bit emulation layer for old apps to run -- and very slowly at that, when ARM chips no longer execute 32-bit code directly. A software emulation of 32-bit ARM would be needed, with perhaps a 10x performance drop.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modernising RISC OS in 2020: is there hope for the ancien... by Teongot on Saturday October 10, 2020 @07:40AM (#24738261)
The cost of simulating 32-bit ARM on 64-bit ARM is nothing like 10x if you try hard enough

https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/56078084/...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modernising RISC OS in 2020: is there hope for the ancien... by lproven on Sunday October 11, 2020 @09:53AM (#24745769)
So I have been informed, in some detail, over on Lobste.rs.

I am glad to hear it. I like this little OS and I want to see it survive!

[ Parent | on HN ]