Re:“35-50% of clicks on Reddit Ads are fraudulent”
by jamiequint on Friday October 09, 2020 @03:30PM
(#24733526)
Is your viewpoint on the morality of agreements that it is morally justifiable to break those which are not legally enforceable, but not morally justifiable to break those which are? Or to state it a different way, the law defines morality.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“35-50% of clicks on Reddit Ads are fraudulent”
by dheera on Friday October 09, 2020 @03:47PM
(#24733703)
I think law and morality are two totally separate concepts.
I operate by morality, but my risk tolerance is bound by legality. For example, for any human rights issue X, will I speak out for X in a place that has free speech but not yet legalized X? Absolutely. Will I speak out for X in a place that I might get a $100 fine? Probably. Will I speak out for X in a place that I might get jailed or beheaded? Probably not.
In this case though I don't consider it immoral to violate certain ToS terms, especially when they track and sell user data and don't offer a clear opt-in/out option to that, and perhaps even doubly on the sites that I actively contribute useful content to the platform in good faith, and the legal risk is extremely low.