Re:ProtonMail CEO calls Apple's forced in-app purchases 'Maf...
by birdyrooster on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:25AM
(#24730770)
How can one be forced to include in app purchases? This seems worded strangely. Maybe I missed the paragraph explaining how Apple did this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ProtonMail CEO calls Apple's forced in-app purchases 'Maf...
by mthoms on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:31AM
(#24730840)
Before: One could subscribe only over the web.
After: You can subscribe in-app (in addition to online) and Apple takes a cut of that purchase. You aren't allowed to mention anywhere in the App that there are alternate (perhaps cheaper) purchase methods.
Re:ProtonMail CEO calls Apple's forced in-app purchases 'Maf...
by TonyTrapp on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:29AM
(#24730817)
Quite simple: You are not allowed to push any further updates until you either 1) allow the subscription to be purchased through Apple or 2) make your service completely free so no IAP is required.
Apple has been rejecting app updates for lesser reasons.
Re:ProtonMail CEO calls Apple's forced in-app purchases 'Maf...
by 188201 on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:35AM
(#24730899)
In addition, Apple doesn't want the app to lay out the fact that the extra customer will pay is an Apple tax, and ban the app because the app show "unnecessary information" to Apple customer.
Re:ProtonMail CEO calls Apple's forced in-app purchases 'Maf...
by viktorcode on Friday October 09, 2020 @04:30PM
(#24734110)
One can’t, and wasn’t.
If you read carefully, you may reconstruct the actual issue and the store policy:
Either Proton mail removes mention of their premium service from the app (and the app can still provide this service to anyone paying outside of App Store) or they keep it and then provide in-app purchases.
They clearly decided to use IAPs. If you ask me, this is a smart move, as many customers won’t be bothering with other payment options.