News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx by ThrowawayR2 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @10:00PM (#24725980)
There's the possibility of a Xilinx Zynq with AMD x86 cores instead of the ARM cores in current Zynq versions, though I'm not sure that would really be interesting to anyone.

Beyond that, there's been research in the past that envisions using a FPGA fabric as an execution unit within the CPU itself: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/emips/ Intel hasn't pursued such a thing but that doesn't mean AMD couldn't.

Re:AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx by ip26 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @11:56PM (#24726653)
I think you'd have a hard time making a large FPGA actually part of a CPU die due to area. A peer on the memory bus ala CCIX on the other hand...

Have you ever thought of building your own processor or maybe just defining your own machine instructions? With eMIPS now you can.

Microcode strikes me as the natural way to define arbitrary instructions.

Re:AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx by rcxdude on Saturday October 10, 2020 @03:21PM (#24741182)
I'm not so sure that's something which is really feasible from a design point of view. Everything involving instructions in the CPU is extremely performance critical and cross-cutting, so designing an interface which allows custom instructions without utterly destroying performance seems like quite a feat. I've a feeling the memory interface is a much more natural place for any integration (this is how it works on any existing FPGA + CPU chips)