A follow up to Coinbase being a mission focused company

Re:A follow up to Coinbase being a mission focused company by throwaway894345 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @04:05PM (#24723281)

What does this mean? If this is yet another “if you’re not for us you’re against us” argument (e.g. if you don’t discuss police violence in the workplace then you necessarily support police violence), then this is false on its face. If this means “the decision to not discuss politics—especially politics unrelated to one’s work—at work is itself a political decision” then fine, but what’s the point? Is the idea that it’s a self-inconsistent position? If so, how? One can discuss even the policy not to discuss politics at work without discussing e.g. police violence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A follow up to Coinbase being a mission focused company by Pils on Thursday October 08, 2020 @04:46PM (#24723780)

one inconsistency is that Coinbase is based in SF. Would you consider "sorry, I didn't get a lot of sleep due to police sound grenades going off until 3am" a political statement?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A follow up to Coinbase being a mission focused company by throwaway894345 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @05:04PM (#24723938)

> one inconsistency is that Coinbase is based in SF

That's not an inconsistency.

> Would you consider "sorry, I didn't get a lot of sleep due to police sound grenades going off until 3am" a political statement?

No, of course not.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A follow up to Coinbase being a mission focused company by Pils on Thursday October 08, 2020 @05:33PM (#24724167)

> > Would you consider "sorry, I didn't get a lot of sleep due to police sound grenades going off until 3am" a political statement?

> No, of course not.

Awesome. So it follows that you would have no issue then with a coworker stating: "Police activity in SF has negatively impacted my ability to do work". Congratulations, you have a significantly broader definition of acceptable workplace speech than Coinbase.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A follow up to Coinbase being a mission focused company by throwaway894345 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @06:20PM (#24724551)

> Awesome. So it follows that you would have no issue then with a coworker stating

Of course I wouldn't have an issue (ignoring for the moment that you're apparently conflating me with coinbase), because this isn't a political statement.

> Congratulations, you have a significantly broader definition of acceptable workplace speech than Coinbase.

This is a pretty obvious straw man argument.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A follow up to Coinbase being a mission focused company by x3n0ph3n3 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @06:25PM (#24724585)

The issue was never about people expressing their political opinions, but their demands that _Coinbase_ express political opinions and get mired in what police in SF may or may not be doing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A follow up to Coinbase being a mission focused company by Rebelgecko on Thursday October 08, 2020 @05:51PM (#24724299)

Can you elaborate on how that's an unacceptable thing to say at coinbase?

[ Parent | on HN ]