Re:An earlier universe can still be observed today, says Rog...
by a1369209993 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @01:58AM
(#24716299)
> But then I thought about it and about any human unit of time really doesn't change the numbers much at all.
As the Wikipedia page[0] puts it:
> Although listed in years for convenience, the numbers beyond this point are so vast that their digits would remain unchanged regardless of which conventional units they were listed in, be they nanoseconds or star lifespans.
As the Wikipedia page[0] puts it:
> Although listed in years for convenience, the numbers beyond this point are so vast that their digits would remain unchanged regardless of which conventional units they were listed in, be they nanoseconds or star lifespans.
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_far_future#cit...