Now that there have been some recent rulings that Amazon is liable for defective products they sell[1], we might see a difference as they put actual effort into it since it's more directly related to the bottom line of their e-commerce business.
1: https://www.businessinsider.com/court-rules-amazon-liable-de...
Seeing 4 posts with pictures of the same failure on reddit is a pretty good sign the product has a problem.
Yes, in order to re-start, but what then? The whole user reviews concept is bonkers, I would add that there are - besides "fake" reviews - "real" ones BUT written by clueless people (in good faith, but completely disconnected from an objective rating), and in this it is also way off the "5 star" rating where 4 stars are already "not so good".
Then it's entirely how much you trust the reviewers, and whether you agree with their matrics/tastes.
I really like wire cutter but they convinced me to buy an awesome convection toaster oven that takes seven minutes to lightly toast a piece of bread on its highest setting.
Exactly, and rightly so.
But as well the "negative" ones like (I swear I have seen more than one of these) "The item arrived but it is a darker yellow than what seen in the pictures on the site." which may have some meaning if you order - say - a scarf to match a coat (but you'd better go to a shop with the coat and find a matching colour scarf) but doesn't really apply to - still say - a chainsaw or a power tool.
I think the best thing online stores can do at this point is just nuke all user-submitted ratings and reviews. They're 99% garbage.