News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Web Services are down by bartonfink on Thursday April 21, 2011 @10:59AM (#2470842)
Why wouldn't a simple expected value calculation work? You've shown that you can calculate the extra availability that subscribing to another region provides. Simply multiply the cost of an outage by the extra availability provided by an additional region that would have prevented that outage.

If expanding to another region costs more than just taking the outage, then it's categorically not a good option. If management still says no in the face of numbers that suggest yes, then that tells you that you're missing a hidden objection, and how you proceed will depend on a lot of factors specific to your situation.

Re:Amazon Web Services are down by hoop on Thursday April 21, 2011 @01:33PM (#2471494)
I think you're right, that would be the best way of presenting this argument to management. To do so, however, the company would need to calculate its Total Cost of Downtime (which probably isn't very complex for many companies) which is its own subject entirely IMO.
Re:Amazon Web Services are down by obfuscate on Thursday April 21, 2011 @04:22PM (#2472209)
> calculate its Total Cost of Downtime (which probably isn't very complex for many companies)

Not complex even factoring in reputational damage?