Re:An opinionated history of programming languages
by nathell on Saturday October 03, 2020 @04:51PM
(#24674577)
The author marked Clojure as a "dying language". I'd be interested to find out the metric by which this is true. In my experience, it is very much alive and thriving.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An opinionated history of programming languages
by nur0n on Saturday October 03, 2020 @05:00PM
(#24674632)
Can you elaborate on your experience?
I have great respect for Rich Hickey and I recently saw a cool talk about a financial startup using Clojure in production [1]. I have kept track of the language for some time but have never had the chance to use it in any serious capacity.
Re:An opinionated history of programming languages
by jolux on Sunday October 04, 2020 @12:09AM
(#24676462)
I think it’s a great language and a good community but I think some of the opposition to static types from Rich Hickey at the top is silly and I also find it genuinely harder to use languages which aren’t gaining wider traction after being around for over ten years.
Re:An opinionated history of programming languages
by jolux on Saturday October 03, 2020 @04:59PM
(#24674628)
Is the language community net growing or shrinking though? A language can be very alive and still not be experiencing tremendous growth.