Re:An Unprecedented Attack on Press Freedom
by torified on Friday October 09, 2020 @12:19AM
(#24726784)
Some presidents seem to have done ok, even with some pretty damn horrible accusations (much much much worse than the ridiculous crime that Assange was accused of).
Read it for yourself: https://www.ericschwartzman.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/c...
Re:An Unprecedented Attack on Press Freedom
by himinlomax on Friday October 09, 2020 @03:40AM
(#24727730)
What is the argument here? That something that can have negative consequences not always does? That's a tautology.
Re:An Unprecedented Attack on Press Freedom
by sleepysysadmin on Monday October 05, 2020 @08:36AM
(#24687140)
In 2018, Sweden made their rape laws significantly worse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Sweden
No threats, coercion, or violence need to be involved. You must have explicit consent for every sexual encounter. Not just intercourse.
So, if you do something sexual but you failed to get her to sign a contract. She later reports the sexual encounter as not having the signed contract. You are a rapist going to prison.
Whether Assange committed a sexual crime or not, it is incontrovertible that accusing him of one was the most effective and least risky way to discrete him. It wouldn't even have required any lying accuser either; manipulating a pissed off lover into reframing their relationship with him as less consensual than it was at the time would be a rather simple exercise for a spymaster.