News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Flatpak: A security nightmare – two years later by franga2000 on Friday October 02, 2020 @11:04AM (#24663374)
I doubt they meant "no matter how hard you try" nor were limiting this to C programs only. Something the size of Firefox, for example, with hundreds of files, multiple languages and dozens of platform variations, is simply not designed for a fully static build and trying to modify it to build like that would be an absurd amount of work for basically no reason, so it hasn't been done and probably never will be.

Add licensing complications to that (Qt is notorious for this) and OP's statement is for all intents and purposes true.

Re:Flatpak: A security nightmare – two years later by otterley on Friday October 02, 2020 @12:59PM (#24664590)
Perhaps so, but Firefox is but one program among the hundreds or thousands that are available in a typical Linux distribution. "Most" implies a quantitative analysis (i.e., more than half), which I think is disputable.
Re:Flatpak: A security nightmare – two years later by hapless on Saturday October 03, 2020 @12:32PM (#24673064)
Firefox has a hard dependency on GTK, so it is literally unbuildable as a static binary.