https://www.amazon.com/dp/0415952786
https://www.thoughtco.com/systemic-racism-3026565
> My own experience of the term's usage is to simply imply that racism is part of a system's inherent structural definition, rather than being purely reliant on individual/group biases.
By that definition, all racism is systemic racism, since the system is made up of people.
I don't know enough in the field to know if Feagin's definition is a popular one worldwide, or even within the US, but it seems somewhat reductive on first reading.
If systemic racism cannot occur outside of the US, what then should we refer to racism that is "systemic" as?
> By that definition, all racism is systemic racism, since the system is made up of people.
Technically, I would agree, but going that far seems somewhat pedantic.
> If systemic racism cannot occur outside of the US, what then should we refer to racism that is "systemic" as?
I don't know, I sincerely don't understand your definition. How can a country be comprised of racist people but have a system that isn't, or vice versa?
My own experience of the term's usage is to simply imply that racism is part of a system's inherent structural definition, rather than being purely reliant on individual/group biases.
In particular in Europe, one very simplistic example of this is the systemic intolerance of nomadic peoples. This is not limited to individuals discriminating against nomadic people, but rather that legislation and bureaucratic processes are in place that give inherent preference to those who are not nomadic; most obviously in laws related to property rentals and ownership, but also pervading every form of corporate and public administration.