This is a great question. As posed I'd say the answer is yes, though I'd dispute the characterization of "not allowed". All I'm saying is that:

1) There exists a zero-point of politicization for this widget company;

2) In this scenario that zero-point corresponds to the decision, "do not bake climate mitigation into company's DNA"; and

3) That decision is one necessary component of the policy that maximizes the company's chance of hitting its goal.

I'm not saying anything prescriptive at all — just highlighting that tradeoffs that are being made, whether or not one is intentional in making them.